Prediction of Taro Daniel [123rd] vs Max Purcell [138th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L L W L L L
Form
L W W L L L W L W LHead To Head: Daniel 3 - 0 Purcell
They have played 6 sets in total, with Daniel winning 6 and Purcell winning 0. The last match between Daniel and Purcell was at the ASB Classic - Auckland, 10-01-2024, Second, Hard with Taro Daniel getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Taro Daniel | 3 |
| Max Purcell | 0 |
| Daniel | Stats | Purcell |
|---|---|---|
| 27% (4-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 123 | Ranking | 138 |
| 58 | Highest Rank | 40 |
| 32 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 14 | Titles | 9 |
| 58% (573-421) | Career Total W/L | 57% (287-215) |
| $2,262,594 | Career Prize Money | $1,208,460 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 3 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Taro Daniel
Player
Max Purcell
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
9 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Max Purcell
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
| 6-3 4-3 ret. |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Max Purcell
42%
(
16 of
38)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
53
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 34 | Games Won | 16 |
| 19 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:9:3 | Average Match Time | 1:9:3 |
| 56% (77/138) | 1st Serve % | 60% (92/154) |
| 87% (67/77) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (60/92) |
| 64% (39/61) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (26/62) |
| 91% (10/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 14% (1/7) |
| 44% (68/154) | Return Points Win % | 23% (32/138) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (3/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (3/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Taro Daniel vs Max Purcell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Daniel 3 - 0 Purcell
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Daniel has won 43% of points on their second serve, while Purcell has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Daniel, in recent form, has won 40.78% of their opponent's second serve points, while Purcell has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 21.72% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Daniel has saved 57.87% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Purcell has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Daniel has won 44.26% of matches played (W/L 27/ 34), with Purcell winning 53.33% (W/L 16/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Daniel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 304/ 203), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 7/ 15). Purcell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 209/ 147), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 20/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Daniel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 16/ 8), where as Purcell has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 10/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Daniel winning 3 times and Purcell being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Daniel winning 6 and Purcell winning 0. The last match between Daniel and Purcell was at the ASB Classic - Auckland, 10-01-2024, Second, Hard with Taro Daniel getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:3.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Daniel and Purcell have played a deciding set 0 times, with Daniel winning 0 times and Purcell 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Daniel winning 0, and Purcell 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Daniel has played against opponents with an average rank of 187.48 while Purcell has played against players with an average rank of 226.53.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Daniel has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Purcell has won 70% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Daniel has converted 25.4% of breakpoint opportunities, and Purcell has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Taro Daniel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Taro Daniel
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Darwin Blanch
Player
Taro Daniel
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
23 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(8) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Mathis Bondaz
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Taro Daniel
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
104)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Taro Daniel
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(2) 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Alex Rybakov
56%
(
58 of
103)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
31%
(
32 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(9) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Tyler Zink
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Taro Daniel
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Taro Daniel
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
70%
(
89 of
128)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
54 of
89)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
26%
(
23 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
128)
116
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Max Purcell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Max Purcell
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Aleksandar Vukic
50%
(
53 of
107)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
9
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
61%
(
33 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
35 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
111
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Max Purcell
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
11
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Tomas Machac
48%
(
31 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
15
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Max Purcell
57%
(
64 of
113)
1st Serve %
55%
(
55 of
100)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
67%
(
33 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
38 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
100)
109
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 7-6(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Max Purcell
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
104)
15
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
5
93%
(
40 of
43)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
47 of
56)
80%
(
24 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
12%
(
9 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
104)
100
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Max Purcell
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
4
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
David Goffin
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Christopher O'Connell
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
17
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
21 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Max Purcell
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
19
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
22 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
90
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Daniel vs Purcell?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Daniel Vs Purcell is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (573/421) | Win/Loss | 57% (287/215) |
| 56% (1316/1033) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (648/539) |
| 52% (11470/10587) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (5863/5606) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.56 |
| 2467 | Aces Total | 3164 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1994 | Total Double Faults | 1013 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:33:52 |
| 166.75 | Average Opponent Rank | 220.02 |
| 63% (35491/56755) | 1st Serve % | 59% (20309/34498) |
| 68% (24080/35491) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (14718/20309) |
| 51% (10829/21255) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (7170/14188) |
| 43% (2402/5588) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1272/3220) |
| 39% (21978/55972) | Return Points Win % | 38% (13496/35605) |
| 59% (549/934) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (278/480) |
| 27% (13/49) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 31% (5/16) |
| 53% (162/307) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (112/200) |
| 50% (148/297) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (96/164) |
| 84% (590/498) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (270/233) |
| 15% (590/91) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (270/37) |
| 18% (404/72) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (231/53) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
